Public Charge Changes: Far Beyond Food Stamps

screen shot 2019-01-21 at 8.11.14 pm

The new public charge regulation penalizes people who have received a range of public benefits, but its focus on barring permanently barring poor immigrants goes far beyond that. The rule targets a grandmother planning to live with her daughter and son-in-law and help care for their children. The rule targets a bright, ambitious immigrant without a college education, who is still ready to do any kind of work to make a better life for their children. In short, the rule targets family reunification and immigrants who have helped to build this country and whose energy and contributions we still need. 

News accounts describe the rule as denying visas to people who have received food stamps, Medicaid, and three federal housing programs. That’s the fear-inspiring part of the provision, clearly intended to scare legal immigrants and citizens away from these and any other public benefits to which they are entitled. Fear is the point, and it is working. The proposed rule was announced almost two years ago, and hundreds of thousands of immigrants pulled themselves and their children out of public programs for fear that noncitizen parents and other family members could be denied the more secure status of legal permanent resident.”

And yet the actual number of people who could be affected by the public benefit portion of the regulation is small compared to the number affected by the rest of the rule. The Catholic Legal Immigration Network describes these provisions:

At the present time, and for the last 20 years, applicants have been able to overcome public charge by submitting an affidavit of support from the petitioner or a joint sponsor that shows evidence of income of at least 125 percent of the federal poverty guidelines. This new rule turns the focus on the applicant and requires the USCIS to balance a list of factors—classifying them as positive or negative, or heavily weighted positive or negative—before reaching a determination. Negative factors could include the applicant’s age (under 18 or over 61), income below 125 percent of the federal poverty guidelines, job skills, work history, high school education, English proficiency, credit rating, health, health insurance coverage, financial liabilities, assets and other resources.”

Court challenges to this regulation continue, although a January 27 Supreme Court ruling allows it to take effect while the long legal process proceeds. USCIS announced it will begin implementing the rule on February 24. As that date approaches, anyone who is considering disenrolling themselves or their children from a public benefit program should seek the advice o an experienced immigration attorney before doing so. And the rest of us should call our Congressional representatives to tell them we want legislation to repeal the rule put in place by administrative action of the Trump anti-immigrant administration.


About Mary Turck

News Day, written by Mary Turck, analyzes, summarizes, links to, and comments on reports from news media around the world, with particular attention to immigration, education, and journalism. Fragments, also written by Mary Turck, has fiction, poetry and some creative non-fiction. Mary Turck edited TC Daily Planet,, from 2007-2014, and edited the award-winning Connection to the Americas and AMERICAS.ORG, in its pre-2008 version. She is also a recovering attorney and the author of many books for young people (and a few for adults), mostly focusing on historical and social issues.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s